You arrived here after searching for the following phrases:
Click a phrase to jump to the first occurrence, or return to the search results.

Physicist Robert Kehoe
New high-energy particle research by a team working with data from Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory further heightens the uncertainty about the exact nature of a key theoretical component of modern physics — the massive fundamental particle called the Higgs boson.
Analysis of data from particle collisions resulting in two leptons helps improve measurements of the mass of another heavy subatomic particle called the top quark, says at Southern Methodist University, who led the team that calculated the measurement. Improving the measurement of the mass of the top quark bears on the nature of the Higgs, says Kehoe, an assistant professor in SMU’s Department of Physics.
The Higgs was postulated in the 1960s to help explain how basic elements of the universe fit together and interact. It is responsible for a phenomenon called the Higgs mechanism, which gives mass to the fundamental particles of nature. Physicists have searched for more than four decades to observe the never-before-seen Higgs. Now they hope it will be observed in the next few years since data started flowing recently from the world’s newest and largest high-energy particle accelerator, the CERN Large Hadron Collider near Geneva, Switzerland.
Physicists theorize that the top quark — because of its sizable mass — is sensitive to the Higgs and therefore may point to it. They theorize that knowing the mass of the top quark narrows the range of where the Higgs will be detected in CERN’s LHC collisions. The top quark is one of 16 species of subatomic particles that physicists have observed. It was predicted in the 1970s and observed in 1995. Increasingly precise measurements of its mass have been achieved almost every year since, and physicists closely watch the incremental measurements of the top quark.
The two-lepton analysis by Kehoe and SMU post-doctoral researcher Peter Renkel looked at data taken over four years during high-energy collisions at Fermilab, a Department of Energy proton-antiproton collider in Batavia, Ill. The two-lepton analysis is one of almost a dozen analyses of the mass of the top quark at a Fermilab experiment called DZero.” The DZero experiment involves 500 physicists and is one of Fermilab’s two large experimental collaborations of scientists. The top quark mass was first observed simultaneously by these two experiments. Several measurements of the top quark’s mass from these two experiments are combined to a “world average” value.
The two-lepton analysis contributed to the latest world average measurement. The analysis looked at particles resulting from smashing protons that break apart and disintegrate. The events are very rare, and the detector can’t see two of the important “ghost” particles — neutrinos — produced by the collision. However, the two leptons are well-measured events and are not seen in other “background” collisions where top quarks are not produced. This allows a rapidly improving precision to be achieved.
The two-lepton research was published in November in the article “Measurement of the top quark mass in final states with two leptons” in Physical Review D, the American Physical Society’s journal of particles, fields, gravitation and cosmology. SMU physicists collaborated on the research with scientists at Boston University. The SMU portion of the work was funded by the Department of Energy. For a link to the article and more information see www.smuresearch.com.
The new world average is so precise that it constrains more tightly than ever the range of possible measurements for the mass of the Higgs, Kehoe says. If the Higgs does prove different than currently expected, physicists may have to rework their long-standing theoretical framework, known as the Standard Model. Scientists worldwide are hoping to validate the Standard Model — which has worked well for more than 30 years to explain everything from radioactivity to computer chips — by actually observing the Higgs.
“The new results may be an indication that the Higgs boson has different properties than the Standard Model indicates,” Kehoe says. “It’s very difficult to devise a theory without some mechanism that mimics fairly well the Higgs mechanism. But if the underlying cause of this mechanism is significantly different, that will have a major impact on the fundamentals of the Standard Model. It could point to something deeper than the standard Higgs boson at work, and that is very interesting.”
The measured value of the top quark mass may even go beyond constraining the standard Higgs. It may suggest that our current understanding of the Higgs is not correct, he says.
If the Higgs does not show up where the constraints indicate, the top measurement may force consideration of new theoretical possibilities that lie outside the existing Standard Model, Kehoe says.
Previous measurements have put the top quark at almost the mass of a gold atom. The new world average measurement puts the top quark at about 186 times the mass of the proton. While the value has changed only a small amount from previous measurements, the percentage of error on the measurement is progressively smaller, in this case less than 1 percent.
“If we make a precise prediction of where the Higgs is and it’s not there, then something is wrong. We’ve just found a major flaw in the model,” says Kehoe, whose work has focused for 16 years on the top quark, including as a graduate student on DZero working directly on the discovery analysis. “It would tell us that the model is oversimplified and that reality is much more complicated.”
THE UNIVERSE AS ILLUSION
Let’s define speed of distribution of gravitation. Two bodies are drawn with any force and to change her it is possible only change of distance between them - i.e. having displaced one of bodies - we shall cause change of force that will lead to to displacement of the second body, or, otherwise, displacing the first body - we create a gravitational wave, observing displacement of the second body - is registered her. However to change position of a body it is possible only with the help of the third body, changing simultaneously and his position - two gravitational waves compensating each other are created. Unique observable effect - resistance of a body to attempts to change his position.
Let’s consider our attempts a little differently. Gravitational interaction is carried out on the lines connecting the centers of weights, - let it there will be gravitational strings. What properties of them to give? We shall displace a body, from set of gravitational strings we shall choose two, strictly forward and back on a direction of movement. The first will be compressed, the second two zones - compression and under pressures will be stretched, will be dragged out, formed, and everyone aspires to return a body in an initial point. Having displaced a body, it is necessary to keep it while waves of compression and under pressure will not disperse on all length gravitational strings. But in the infinite flat universe it gives nothing - at any final speed of gravitation time of deduction indefinitely. We shall close the universe. Waves of compression and under pressure will swallow up each other, there is time of deduction - time of movement of a wave on a circle. Let time of movement a zero. Then the inert weight is instant gravitational reaction of the closed universe.
Einstein has proved it more elegantly. If gravitation is a curvature of space the infinite straight line is closed - moving on by her, we shall return to an initial point. But to return to an initial point it is possible only during initial time, duration of such movement is equal to zero, speed is higher light and has forbidden the proof. Simply on has overlooked - to divide on a zero is impossible and instantly - is not faster, it is incommensurable with C.
Idea of Newton, principle of the Mach, Einstein’s proof - all for a long time is known, however some consequences can represent insignificant interest. So:
The inert weight is instant gravitational reaction of the closed universe
But if the space is closed, time also is closed
But then the universe has no neither the beginnings, nor the end
But then time of life U. is equal to zero
But then at U. infinite set of lives
But then they are not necessarily identical
But then at everyone the set of interactions
But then, probably, there is even one set of interactions closing space and time in infinity
And all this simultaneously, i.e. develops.
But then begins cinema - if the infinite set is virtual-lethal U. in the sum is given by a zero, infinite set identical, is virtual-immortal U., being imposed, create illusion real U.
Illusion - any attempt to specify the microcosm device gives return result for on the one hand reduces density real U., and with another does visible reduction process to zero of the sum virtual, there are the interactions which do not have any rights on
The fine idea of knowledge of the world generates phantoms - and what with them now to make?
It is curious, that spatial isolation is reflected by an equivalence principle, time isolation - an uncertainty principle, both naked fixing - the devil only knows why, but heavy and inert weights are completely not casually equal, and any attempt to specify device V yields strictly return result.
Artificiality both is obvious - whether their further presence is justified?
Detecting of gravitational waves not a problem - longitudinal waves create inert weight, cross-section - electromagnetic radiation, the third variant - electro-gravitational waves is presented unevidently that is why it is not known. Small misunderstanding, not noteworthy.